Home   |  Publications   |   Conferences    |  Join   |   Contact   | Sitemap  

Journal of Molecular and Genetic Medicine

    An International Journal of Biomedical Research         Open Access, Peer-reviewed
ISSN: 1747-0862
home » open-access » aptamers-promising-molecules-for-cancer-stem-cell-targeting-1747-0862 Rss Feed Rss Feed
Review Article Open Access
Aptamers: Promising Molecules for Cancer Stem Cell Targeting
1Molecular Biology Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan Said I Ismail1*, 2Université Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8612, Faculté de Pharmacie, 5 Rue Jean-Baptiste Clément,Châtenay-Malabry, France Walhan Alshaer2, 1Molecular Biology Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan Nidaa Ababneh1 and 2Université Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8612, Faculté de Pharmacie, 5 Rue Jean-Baptiste Clément,Châtenay-Malabry, France Elias Fattal2
Corresponding Author : Dr. Said I. Ismail
Molecular Biology Research Laboratory
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan
Amman 11942, Jordan
Tel: 00962 6 5355000 ext 23472
E-mail: sismail@ju.edu.jo
Received July 29, 2013; Accepted November 21, 2013; Published November 25, 2013
Citation: Ismail SI, Alshaer W, Ababneh N, Fattal E (2013) Aptamers: Promising Molecules for Cancer Stem Cell Targeting. J Mol Genet Med 7:90 doi: 10.4172/1747-0862.1000090
Copyright: © 2013 Ismail SI, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Related article at
DownloadPubmed DownloadScholar Google
Visit for more related articles at
DownloadJournal of Molecular and Genetic Medicine

The term Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) has been coined to refer to a subpopulation of tumor cells that has the ability to self-renew and to generate the diverse cell pool of a given tumor. In the last decade CSCs have been receiving a lot of interest due to their cancer initiating and maintaining capabilities making them the real driving force within a malignant mass that pushes towards more aggressive proliferation and more resistance against anticancer drugs. These cells have been linked to different specific markers in an attempt to achieve efficient isolation and characterization. Such markers include CD44, EpCAM and CD133 among others.
Aptamers are synthetic single stranded oligonucleotides selected from a huge pool of random sequences which can fold and bind to a wide range of targets with high affinity and specificity. They are not immunogenic or toxic and have good clearance rates, qualities that make aptamers a good rival to monoclonal antibodies in their diagnostic as well as therapeutic applications.
This review explores the potential applications of aptamers selected to target the main markers of CSCs. Such applications include diagnostic assays and analytical platforms where such aptamers can be utilized to detect and characterize the behavior of these cells in addition to predicting and monitoring disease course and response to different treatment regimens. The potential therapeutic applications are also discussed in details, where such anti- CSC aptamers can be used in a variety of formulations to efficiently target the initiating cores of tumors.

Aptamers; SELEX; Cancer stem cells
Cancer is one of leading cause of death around the world and accounts for around 13% of world wide deaths according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. Cancer is a general term describing a large number of disorders that can affect various tissues and organs within the body. One main feature common to all cancers is the continuous and uncontrolled proliferation of cells which usually spread and invade neighboring or even distant tissues in a process known as metastasis. Most current treatment regimens aim at restraining this proliferation and metastasis of such cells. However, most of these regimens encounter some poorly understood clinical events, including drug resistance, minimal residual disease, and tumor relapse [2]. One of the main hypotheses that attempt to explain such events states that malignancies depend on a small population of stem-like cells for tumor initiation and proliferation, where these cells, which are more resistant to therapeutic drugs, constitute the main driving force for cancer maintenance [3]. These cells were therefore given the name "cancer stem cells" (CSCs).
As more evidence supports the CSC hypothesis, better characterization and targeting of such cells could have major impacts on the ongoing battle against cancer [4]. The "blind" chemotherapy treatment for cancer patients with its poor outcome and unbearable side effects will become something of the past once the new generation of "smart" targeted drugs becomes available. Such drugs are usually led to their target cells by antibodies, but recently, a new rival for antibodies is emerging under the name of aptamers. These are single stranded nucleic acid ligands with highly complex three-dimensional structures and recognition properties capable of binding tightly and specifically to targets ranging from small molecules to complex multimeric structures. Several aptamers were evolved to target cell specific biomarkers including those on the surface of tumor cells [5-7]. Such aptamers have been used for targeted delivery of diverse cargos including chemotherapeutic agents, nanoparticles, and drug encapsulated liposomes. The mechanism of delivery is based on the specific interaction between the aptamer and its membrane receptor, which enhances the internalization and accumulation of therapeutic agents inside the target cells. Such delivery would increase drug potency and limit unwanted toxic side effects [8].
The Concept of Cancer Stem Cells
Within the context of the evolving hypothesis of CSCs, scientists are stressing the fact the tumor mass is made up of a heterogeneous group of cells. These include, rapidly proliferating cells in addition to post-mitotic differentiated cells, as well as a smaller number of stem cells capable of long term self-renewal. Scientists are carefully differentiating between two key types of tumor cells; the cell-of-origin and the CSC. The cell of origin mostly refers to the cell that received the first genetic alterations in the transformation process, thereby referred to as the tumor initiating cell, while the CSC is the cell that holds the ability to propagate the tumor. Indeed, there is a growing evidence of a phenotypic variation between the two cells. Such variation is in support of what has been largely observed with regards to the heterogeneity of the cellular composition of various tumors in terms of the genetic alterations involved, proliferation potential, cellular phenotypes and therapeutic response [4,9,10].
There are two main mechanisms that attempt to explain tumor development and heterogeneity. The first refers to a stochastic model where all cells within a tumor can contribute equally to the initiation and maintenance of the tumor mass. The second mechanism on the other hand, arranges cancer cells in a hierarchical model, where a subgroup of cells have similar qualities and duties to those of stem cells found in normal tissues, in being clonogenic and capable of continuously regenerating other tumor cells. These CSCs are supposed to be found in a special niche, and are behind the resistance to anti-cancer treatments, as well as being actively involved in metastasis [11]. The exact percentage of CSCs within various tumors is still undetermined, but there are many reports claiming that this percentage is under 1:1000 [12-15]. However, some more recent reports suggest that the numbers of CSCs might be significantly higher [16,17].
Among the mounting body of evidence, supporting the CSC model is the long standing observation that cancer cells have a clearly variable potential to start new tumors. This is usually most clear upon injection of such cells into immunodeficient nude mice. Different cancer cell populations, grouped by their specific surface marker profiles, have wide differences in their abilities to form new tumor masses [18]. A good example here is the repeatedly successful xenograft tumor induction in mice when injecting colorectal cancer cells expressing the CD133 surface marker, a known CSC marker, as compared to CD133- cells which fail to form tumors. Bao and coworkers investigated the possible role of CSCs radio-resistance in glioma patients using short term cell cultures from primary glioma xenografts and primary patient glioblastoma specimens [19]. This study showed that the population of CSCs was enriched noticeably by irradiation and that those irradiated CSCs had survival advantages relative to non-CSCs. Moreover, the irradiated CSCs showed enrichment of CD133+ cells in comparison to parent cells [20].
It is needless to say that discovering cell surface markers differentially expressed on CSC will greatly boost our understanding of the behavior of these cells by being able to better isolate, enrich, and even target them. Several such markers have indeed been described including CD44, CD133 and EpCAM. However, it is worth mentioning here that questions are being continuously raised about the specificity of and the role of these described CSC markers in various tumors. For example, Shmelkov et al. demonstrated that both CD133+ and CD13- human metastatic colon cancer cells exhibit CSC properties and were able to initiate tumors thereby suggesting that CD133 could not differentiate between colon CSCs and differentiated metastatic colon cancer cells [21]. On the other hand, another study performed by Kemper and his colleagues, concluded that failure in detection of CD133 with differentiation of colon CSCs is not related to the loss in CD133 expression. Rather, post-translation modifications to the AC133 epitope of CD133 lead to changes in glycosylation and conformational changes that mask AC133 epitope detection, which is associated with CSC differentiation [22]. Such uncertainty extends to other known CSC markers, which is why scientists believe that there remains a need to discover and characterize more CSC markers that are more exclusively expressed on such cells.
CSC and drug resistance
Treatment of malignancies using conventional therapeutic regimens including chemotherapy and radiotherapy still fails to extirpate many tumors, a failure indicated usually by the relapse of tumors following initial remission. Cancer radio- or chemotherapies target mainly the highly proliferative cells and initially leads to reduction in the bulk of the tumor mass [23]. However, in many cancers, these therapies fail to prevent tumor relapse in the long-term. One explanation that is receiving wide acceptance for such recurrent relapse is the existence of CSCs, which are more resistant to the toxic effect of antitumor drugs. This explanation also reflects the inability of such conventional antitumor therapies to target CSCs [24,25] (Figure 1).
Many studies were conducted to investigate the mechanism of CSC resistance to conventional antitumor therapies. Radiation can cause damage to DNA of cancer cells resulting in induction of apoptosis pathways. However, CSCs were shown to be able to repair DNA damage more rapidly than the non-CSC populations through the activation of DNA damage checkpoints which require intact Chk1/2 kinases to arrest cancer cells and then repair the damaged DNA [26,27]. Woodward and coworkers also showed the role of the Wnt/β- catenin pathway in radio-resistance of CSCs of breast cancer cell lines by enhancing the self-renewal pathway and thus increasing survival [28,29]. Moreover, Todaro et al. suggested a role for interleukin-4 receptor in the chemotherapeutic resistance of colon CSCs. They found that when the interleukin-4 receptors were blocked using antibodies, CSCs became more sensitive to chemotherapy and sustained remission was observed [30].
CSCs were also shown to have increased capacity to express drug efflux pumps such as multidrug resistance transporter1 (MDR1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and many studies have shown the ability of such pumps to remove chemotherapeutic agents out of the cells Interestingly. Studies have implicated CSCs in angiogenesis by expression of higher levels of vascular endothelial factor (VEGF) compared to the non-CSC population. One such study was performed on CSCs from glioma models, which demonstrated an over-expression of VEGF that was associated with more vesicular and hemorrhagic tumors [31,32].
The emergence of aptamers
Background: Aptamers are short single-stranded oligonucleotides of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequences that fold into unique secondary and tertiary structures which allow them to bind to target molecules with high affinity and selectivity. Specific aptamers are selected from large libraries of random sequences synthesized by combinatorial chemistry. The process by which they are selected is called SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment).
The very first chapters of the aptamer story were written around 20 years ago, when two groups almost simultaneously put the building blocks of this new technology. In 1990, Szostak and Gold pioneered the in vitro evolutionary process which they termed SELEX for selection of RNA ligands that can bind the T4 DNA polymerase [33], while Ellington and Szostak developed a variety of short RNA ligands against some organic dyes. They gave these RNA ligands the name Aptamers, which they derived from the Latin word “aptus”– which means fitting and the Greak word “meros”, which means particle [34].
Since its first description, there have been many modifications and variations on the SELEX procedure. In its basic format, the procedure begins with synthesis of a nucleic acid library, followed by repetitive rounds of screening and selection of sequences that can bind the desired target, after which the final group of selected aptamers is put through sequence analysis as well as structural studies of resulting aptamer-target complexes (Figure 2). The nucleic acid library could be a DNA or RNA library usually containing 1014-1015 different sequences. Each sequence usually contains 20-60 nucleotide-long random region flanked by two constant regions. These fixed regions are usually designed to include a promoter region, restriction sites for cloning, and primer sites for reverse transcription and PCR amplification [35].
A classical SELEX round starts by first allowing the pool of random sequences to fold under the required experimental conditions before incubating this pool with the target molecule. The target-bound aptamers are separated from the non-binders and are then PCR amplified. This results in a new smaller library with which the next round of selections begins. These steps are repeated several times to enrich populations of aptamers that have increasing target affinity and specificity. The rounds of enrichment and amplification are continued until the pool is saturated with much fewer species of dominating aptamers. The selected candidates are then cloned and characterized. In the case of RNA aptamers, there is one main extra step which includes in vitro transcription to produce the RNA library and reverse transcription before amplifying the selected sequences [36].
In recent years, many reports described a number of new SELEX variants to meet the ever expanding applications for aptamers and improve their qualities as well as reducing time and cost of production. Examples of these variants include counter SELEX, which utilizes analogues to the target to eliminate aptamers recognizing similar targets, and thus increase the selectivity of the obtained sequences [37]. Cell specific SELEX (CS-SELEX) is another important method used to discover new cell specific surface markers. This method is particularly useful for identification of cancer-specific markers, where the aptamer library is alternated between the cancer cell and its normal counterpart to select sequences capable of exclusively recognizing the abnormal cell [38]. More recently, there have been several modifications on the classical manual SELEX procedure towards more automation and utilization of modern technology [39].
Owing to their many useful characteristics, aptamers are being used in a wide variety of applications including diagnostics, purification processes, drug discovery, and therapeutics [40]. In diagnostics, aptamers were shown to fit in a variety of platforms where they can substitute for monoclonal antibodies. Moreover, aptamer-based assays have proven to be very sensitive reaching considerably low detection limits [41]. As aptamers are chemically synthesized, they can be easily modified at their 3' or 5' end with many useful functional groups or conjugates. Linking aptamers to molecules like biotin would allow their immobilization on a carrier surface where they function as capture ligands [42]. Recently, several bio-analytical methods have used nucleic acid probes to detect specific sequences of RNA or DNA targets through hybridization. These specific nucleic acids have been used in many analytical applications including affinity chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, mass spectrometry, biosensors, and Enzyme Linked Oligonucleotide Assay (ELONA) [43].
The use of aptamers in drug discovery holds great potential as they are particularly suited as artificial ligands for target validation applications in the context of high-throughput screening (HTS). Such an approach is especially useful when the natural ligand is not known or the exact structure is unavailable. In addition, such screening assays are useful when new motifs on a protein are being studied, looking for small-molecule drugs with potentially novel mechanisms of action [40].
In therapeutic applications, aptamer technology received a great confidence boost in 2004 with the first FDA approval of a therapeutic aptamer called Macugen (pegaptamib) by Pfizer and Eyetech, which is an anti-VEGF aptamer used to treat age-related macular degeneration of the eye. For their clinical use, scientists had to modify aptamers in many ways to overcome a number of obstacles. One of these obstacles is that aptamers, especially RNA aptamers, are susceptible to nuclease degradation. However, the stability of RNA aptamers in vivo can be easily enhanced by simple chemical modifications including 2'-fluoro pyrimidine, 2'-O-methyl nucleotides and 3' end cap modifications [44]. Other modifications on aptamers have been used to slow down the rapid renal clearance of such small (5–25 kDa) and highly water soluble molecules. Such enhancement of bioavailability has been achieved by linkage with cholesterol or polyethylene glycol as anchor groups [45]. Aptamers developed as therapeutics have a wide range of actions including anti-infectives, anti-coagulants, anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenesis, anti-proliferative, and immune modulators [46,47].
Aptamers versus monoclonal antibodies: Although different in chemistry, structure, production method and other aspects, the nearest class of molecules that have comparable functional properties and similar diagnostic and therapeutic applications would be monoclonal antibodies. Aptamers have been shown to bind their targets with high affinities with Kds in the picomolar to nanomolar range, and with very high specificity enabling them to distinguish between very closely related targets. For example, anti-L-selectin aptamers are 8,000-15,000 fold and 200-500 fold more specific to their target as opposed to P-selectin and E-selectin, respectively [48]. Moreover, researchers involved in aptamer technology always like to emphasize some advantages that aptamers have over monoclonal antibodies. For example, unlike antibodies which are usually produced by the complex and labor intensive Hybridoma technique which involves extensive tissue culture work and the immunization of a mammalian host, aptamers are produced by SELEX which is a relatively simple in vitro chemical method. In SELEX, conditions like pH, ionic strength, temperature and the process of selection can be easily controlled to achieve efficient selection. This also means that aptamers can be developed not just against immunogenic proteins, but also against a wide range of target molecules including drugs and other small molecules, and even against whole cells [41].
One clear advantage, aptamers have as therapeutic agents, is that they are largely non-immunogenic as studies on humans and mammalians showed no antigenic response. In addition, aptamers have also been shown to exhibit no or little toxicity. The best data in this regard comes from work on the FDA approved therapeutic aptamer Macugen, which has been used safely for years [49-51]. Nevertheless, a recent study showed that ssDNA aptamers might provoke an immune response after systemic administration into fresh human blood. Therefore, preclinical experiments to investigate such immune responses against each therapeutic aptamer are highly recommended [52]. However, and even in the unlikely event of aptamer induced adverse pharmacological reactions, such reactions can be easily controlled by an antidote which can simply be another single stranded oligonucleotide that has the antisense base sequence. The Watson-Crick base pairing between the aptamer and the antidote would alter the shape of aptamer and thus inhibit the binding of the aptamer to its target [45] (Table 1).
Aptamers for targeted drug delivery: Several nucleic acid aptamers were evolved to target cell specific biomarkers including those on the surface of tumor cells. Such aptamers have been used for targeted delivery of diverse molecules including chemotherapeutic agents, nanoparticles, drug-encapsulated liposomes, small interfering RNA (siRNA), toxins, and radioactive materials [53-58]. The mechanism of delivery is based on the specific interaction between the aptamer and its cellular membrane receptor or antigen, which might then enhance the internalization and accumulation of therapeutic agents into the targeted cells. Such controlled delivery will thereby result in increasing drug potency and efficacy as well as decrease unwanted toxic side effects.
One representative example was reported by Lupold et al. who isolated modified 2`-fluoro-RNA aptamers against the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) which is highly expressed on human prostate cancer cells [59]. Using these aptamers, many other studies have successfully attempted to conjugate these aptamers with various active motifs and nanocarrier systems to mediate cell specific targeted delivery for therapeutic and imaging purposes of PSMA positive cells. These conjugates include nanoparticles, small interfering RNA (siRNA) and antitumor drugs. As for nanoparticles, Farokhzad et al. developed Docetaxel encapsulated nanoparticles functionalized with a specific aptamer (A10) to target PSMA expressing cells (denominated Dtxl- NP-Apt) [60]. The nanoparticle was formulated with Poly (lactic-coglycolicacid) (PLGA) co-polymered with Poly ethylene glycol (PEG). PLGA is considered as one of the most successful biodegradable and biocompatible polymer used to formulate nanoparticles and is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medical Agency (EMA) for many drug delivery systems in humans [61]. Moreover, the addition of polyethylene glycol on the surface of nanoparticles was used to improve the pharmacokinetics of the involved therapeutics by increasing the circulation half-life of these nanoparticles [62]. The results of this study demonstrated the ability of the Dtxl-NP-Apt bioconjugate to enhance in vitro cellular cytotoxicity to LNCaP PSMA expressing cells and increase tumor reduction in LNCaP xenograft nude mice, as compared to the therapeutic potency of Dtxl-NP or Dtxl alone [60].
siRNA is considered a promising and attractive therapeutic molecule that is able to specifically knockdown and silence gene expression via RNA interference. siRNA advantages include specificity of targeting, low immunogenicity, and simplicity of design [63]. However, cells are unable to efficiently take up siRNA and it requires a delivery vehicle for it to reach its intracellular targets [64]. To overcome this problem, aptamers have been successfully used to increase the internalization of siRNA by a receptor-mediated mechanism. McNammara et al. developed an aptamer-siRNA chimeric RNA molecule by covalent conjugation of the anti PSMA aptamer (A10) with siRNA molecules that target the two tumor survival genes, Polo-Like Kinase 1 (Plk1) and BCL2 [65]. The results of this study showed the ability of the A10- siRNA chimera to bind specifically to LNCaP cells (PSMA positive) while failing to bind PC-3 cells (PSMA negative). Moreover, silencing of targeted genes (Plk1 and BCL2) was shown to be specific and comparable with the binding/uptake of A10-siRNA chimera to the level of PSMA expression on LNCaP cells. The efficacy of the A10-siRNA chimeras in tumor reduction was tested by intratumoral injection these chimeras into xenografted tumor models of prostate cancer. A marked regression in the tumor volume was observed in PSMA-positive tumors while treating PSMA-negative control tumors with the same A10-siRNA chimeras showed an increase in tumor volume thereby indicating the specificity and therapeutic potency of the A10-siRNA chimeras in invivo models [65]. In another study, a second generation of the A10- siRNA chimera (A10-Plk1) was developed to be more cost effective and easier to synthesize. The 79 nucleotides full length A10 aptamer was truncated into a 39 nucleotides length aptamer (A10-3.2 aptamer) without significant change in the binding affinity and specificity to PSMA on target cells. This and other modifications performed on the aptamer-siRNA chimera enhanced the silencing activity and specificity of siRNA inside the cells. Moreover, 20 KD PEG was conjugated to 5’ terminal of RNA chimera to increase the circulating half-life. The end results of this study showed that the second generation of A10-3.2- siRNA-PEG chimera was more optimal for systemic administration rather than intratumoral injections and has a greater gene silencing capability in vivo [66].
Combinations of two or more therapies that hold additive or synergistic effect are common in cancer treatment to overcome the development of drug resistant and decrease therapeutic doses thereby decreasing undesirable side effects [67]. Kim et al. investigated the synergistic effect of short hairpin RNA against the Bcl-Xl anti apoptotic protein and Doxorubicin, the anti-cancer chemotherapy drug, using the anti-PSMA aptamer (A10) conjugated to polyplexes composed of polyethyleneimine (PEI) grafted to polyethylene glycol (PEG) to form the nanoplatform shRNA/PEI-PEG-APT/DOX. The anti-cancer effect of this nanoplatform was evaluated on LNCaP cell line and PC-3 cell line and the cellular viability results showed high specific inhibition of shRNA/PEI-PEG-APT/DOX to PSMA expressing cells compared to the mixture of Doxorubicin and shRNA alone indicated by a 17-fold decrease in the IC50 value of shRNA/PEI-PEG-APT/DOX compared to the IC50 values for the Doxorubicin and shRNA mixture [68].
Another interesting example is the development of the DNA aptamer (AS1411) that recognizes and binds with high affinity and specificity to nucleolin (NCL). This AS1411 aptamer was shown to be able to cross the cell membrane via NCL-mediated internalization [69]. NCL is a multifunctional protein involved in many cellular pathways including DNA metabolism and RNA regulatory mechanisms. NCL has been linked to many pathological abnormalities including cancer and viral infection [70]. Therefore, the AS1411 aptamer could be useful in targeting cancer cells that over-express NCL. Indeed, in 2009, Cao et al. developed an AS1411aptamer functionalized liposome with Cisplatin encapsulated inside for cancer-cell-specific targeting. Cisplatin is one of the most potent anticancer chemotherapies that work by inducing DNA damage. However, Cisplatin lacks specificity and can cause severe and widespread side effects on normal cells [71]. The cytotoxic effect of the aptamer-liposome-cisplatin complexes were evaluated using MCF- 7 (NCL positive) and LNCaP (NCL negative) cell lines and the results showed a greater damage to MCF-7 cells compared to LNCaP cells. The cytotoxic effect of cisplatin on MCF-7 and LNCaP was reported to have IC50 values of 28 μM and 5.95 μM, respectively. The AS1411 anti-NCL aptamer was first tagged with a cholesterol moiety and then inserted into the hydrophobic lipid part of the liposome. Interestingly, in the same study, the authors described a complimentary DNA strand to AS1411 aptamer that works as an antidote and can reverse the action of aptamer-mediated targeted drug delivery [72].
In addition, several other cell-specific aptamers that were developed against tumor markers such as MUC-1, Protein Tyrosine Kinase 7 (PTK7) and Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) among others clearly demonstrated the great potential for aptamer mediated delivery systems [8].
Aptamers for molecular recognition and biomarker discovery: Since the early development of the SELEX method, studies have been conducted to utilize aptamers in diagnostic applications owing to their promising properties as highly versatile molecular recognition agents. As mentioned earlier, and similar to monoclonal antibodies, aptamers can bind to their targets with high affinity and specificity enabling them to detect very low target concentrations and to discriminate between very closely related targets. For example, Jenison et al. selected an anti-theophylline aptamer that was 10,000 fold more likely to bind theophylline as opposed to caffeine, two structurally similar molecules which differ by only a single methyl group [37]. In another example, Geiger et al. described a binding affinity of an anti-L-argenin RNA aptamer that was 12,000 times stronger than that for its binding to D-argenin [73]. Moreover, Jeong et al. identified an RNA aptamer that binds around 50 fold better to mutant KRAS having a point mutation in codon 12 (KRASV12), compared to the wild type KRAS protein [74].
The SELEX methodology can be efficiently utilized for the selection of aptamers against a wide variety of targets making it a powerful tool for different biomedical applications. Selection of aptamers against characterized purified protein targets can be easily performed by simple conventional SELEX. However, the main limitation with such SELEX against pure targets is that the selected aptamers frequently fail to bind the protein target in its native cellular state [5]. One modification was suggested to solve this issue by developing a complex target selection method to select aptamers against proteins in a complex mixture of targets prepared from membrane preparations or whole living cells, thus enabling the aptamers to bind its target in their preferred native state. Moreover, one important advantage to this method is the ability to select aptamers against unknown targets without detailed previous knowledge and characterization of the target, which makes it possible to discover and identify cell specific markers on diseased cells such as cancer cells and viral infected cells [5,7].
Cell-SELEX is a variant procedure used to select aptamers against targets on living cells including parasites, bacteria, viruses, stem cells, and tumor cells. Shangguan et al. developed a cell-based aptamer selection strategy to select ssDNA aptamers that bind molecular signatures on tumor cell lines. Two selected hematopoietic cancer cell lines were used as a model, the T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell line CCRF-CEM was the target cell line and the Burkitt’s lymphoma Ramos cell line, was used for counter selection to remove aptamers that bind to shared molecules on the surface of those closely related cell lines [75]. Following successful selection of specific aptamers, further investigation is usually performed using proteomics to characterize the marker that is uniquely expressed on the targeted cell line. One good example on the potency of this procedure is the tyrosine protein kinase-like 7 (PTK7) protein which was discovered and identified as a signature biomarker for T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia making it a good candidate for specific targeting of these cells. Moreover, and in similar experiments using cell-SELEX, many other biomarkers were discovered including the glycoprotein Tenascin-C, which was discovered on the glioblastoma-derived cell line (U251), and the immunoglobulin μ heavy chain (IGHM) as a biomarker for Burkitt's lymphoma using Ramose cell lines [76,77].
Aptamers against specific CSC markers
Selection of aptamers against specific markers of CSCs provides a powerful tool for a myriad of applications that would help to better understand the biological behaviour of these cells. Such specific aptamers can be utilized in various assay platforms to isolate, enrich, and identify CSCs for analytical and diagnostic purposes in addition to the potential of being used in targeted drug delivery. The most crucial step towards the successful development of such applications is the characterization of specific markers for CSCs. Indeed, in recent years, and with the identification of such markers, reports started to emerge describing the selection of CSC specific aptamers. Following is a brief description of the available related literature.
Aptamers against epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM): The epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM; CD326) is a transmembrane glycoprotein originally discovered on colon carcinomas [78]. EpCAM has been described as a CSC marker of mammary colorectal and pancreatic cancers [79]. EpCAM is also known to be a tumor associated antigen because of its frequent discovery in a wide variety of carcinomas [80]. Currently, the overexpression of EpCAM on most carcinoma types is used as a diagnostic marker with some prognostic value and as a target in antibody based clinical trials [81]. EpCAM is widely distributed in normal human epithelial tissues but is typically overexpressed in a variety of carcinomas including most human adenocarcinomas as well as squamous cell carcinomas. In the case of breast and ovarian cancers, EpCAM mRNA was found to be more than 100-fold overexpressed relative to normal epithelial tissues. Its overexpression usually correlates with a decrease in survival in breast and ovarian cancers [82,83].
Several clinical trials were performed to target EpCAM expressing tumor cells with monoclonal antibodies. Such trials showed inconsistent results, which was related in part to the large size, affinity, and high immunogenicity of antibodies [80,84]. Therefore, selection of small aptamers that can target EpCAM could be a good alternative for these antibodies. Shigdar et al. isolated modified RNA aptamers that can bind to EpCAM from a random oligonucleotide library. The highest affinity selected EpCAM aptamer did bind to EpCAM positive gastric carcinoma cells Kato III with a Kd of 211 ± 36.2 nM. The full length EpCAM aptamer (73 nt long) was further truncated into smaller oligos by performing two rounds of truncation. The first truncation ended with the EpDT1 aptamer (43 nt long) and the second round ended with the EpDT3 aptamer (19 nt long), the Kds of truncated aptamers were 85.7 ± 24 and 12.0 ± 6.5 nM (using Kato II cells), respectively. Interestingly, the apparent Kd increased from 12 nM to 54.5 nM when EpDT3 was labeled with the DY647 fluorophore. This EpDT3- DY647 labeled aptamer was incubated with a number of human cancer cells derived from breast, colorectal, and gastric cancers that express EpCAM, and the fluorescent intensity from each cell line was analyzed using flow cytometry. The results corresponded well with the known EpCAM expression levels for each of the representative cell lines. Moreover, confocal microscopic analysis showed EpDT3- DY647 to be internalized after binding through receptor mediated endocytosis [85]. This study describes the first selection of modified RNA aptamers that can specifically bind the EpCAM CSC marker and successfully induce internalization by endocytosis. This should prompt further investigation of the potency of the selected aptamer using in vivo models, and probably the conjugation of this aptamer to drug nanocarriers or imaging systems for various clinical purposes.
Aptamers against the HA domain of CD44: CD44 comprises a family of glycoproteins encoded by a single gene [86], which vary in size due to N- and O-glycosylation and insertion of alternatively spliced variable exon products in the extracellular domains of the molecule [79]. CD44 is a multi-structural and multi-functional cell surface molecule involved in cell proliferation, cell differentiation, cell migration, angiogenesis and presentation of cytokines, chemokines and growth factors to the corresponding receptors. It is a unique adhesion molecule and several studies have revealed that CD44 is over expressed at the mRNA and protein levels in most types of solid tumors [87].
CD44 is the main receptor for hyaluronic acid (HA). Therefore, HA was considered as a promising carrier for active targeting of therapeutic and imaging molecules into CD44 expressing tumor cells. However, HA lacks specificity as it can bind to several proteins other than the CD44 receptor [88]. Based on that, selection of aptamers that bind specifically to the extracellular part of CD44 could be a promising agent for active targeting. DNA thioaptamers (TAs) were selected to bind the hyaluronic acid binding domain (HABD) of the CD44 protein with high specificity and affinity. The binding affinities of the selected TAs were in nanomolar concentrations (180-295 nM), which is higher than the affinity of the natural ligand, hyaluronic acid (micromolar concentrations). The selected TAs did bind successfully to CD44 positive human ovarian cancer cell lines (SKOV3, IGROV, and A2780) but failed to bind the CD44 negative NIH3T3 fibroblast cell line [89].
Our group has recently managed to successfully select high affinity RNA aptamers against standard CD44 (CD44s) [90]. We used a 2’-F-pyrimidine modified RNA library to isolate RNA aptamers against GST tagged human recombinant full-length CD44 protein. The binding specificities for one of the selected RNA aptamers (Apt1) was assessed using representative breast cancer cell lines expressing CD44, namely MDA-MB-231, MCF7 and T47D. The selected RNA aptamer was found to interact specifically with such cancer cells when analysed by flow cytometry and fluorescent microscopy with different intensities of fluorescence, reflecting the level of CD44 expression on the surface of these cells. We also tested the binding affinity for Apt1 with the CD44 protein and our results have clearly shown a high binding affinity with Kd in the nanomolar range. This work further demonstrates that the CD44 receptor can be efficiently targeted by aptamers with affinities and specificities that are comparable or even higher than that of hyaluronic acid, the natural CD44 ligand. Therefore, it is expected that such aptamers can be successfully implicated in diagnostic and therapeutic applications.
RNA aptamers targeting CD133: CD133 is a cell surface glycoprotein with five transmembrane domains and is considered as a universal marker of normal hematopoietic and organ-specific stem cells [91]. It has gained more prominence as a marker of CSCs in solid primary tumors such as medulloblastomas and glioblastomas and subsequently of CSCs in a growing number of cancers of epithelial tissues. It has also been identified in CSCs of many other tissues, including prostate cancer and colon cancer [92,93].
Shigdar et al. identified two 2`-fluoropyrimidine modified RNA aptamers, CD133-A15 and CD133-B19. The CD133-A15 aptamer showed the ability to bind the AC133 epitope of CD133 while the CD133-B19 aptamer was able to bind to the extracellular domain of CD133. These selected aptamers also managed to successfully bind CD133 positive cell lines (HT-29 and Hep3B) with nanomolar affinities, while failing to bind negative CD133 cells lines (HEK293 and T98G) [94]. This study demonstrates the ability of selected aptamers to bind to certain epitopes of the tumour marker that appears on more primitive CSCs thereby providing more specificity in targeting. Still, an in vivo study that investigates the potency of such selected aptamer could provide further valuable information for this promising work and would stimulate similar efforts to select and use other aptamers against other targets.
Aptamers identified against brain CSCs: A recent study performed by Kim et al. used the cell-SELEX technique to isolate DNA aptamers against the glioblastoma brain tumour initiating cells with high affinity and specificity. This study used glioblastoma tumor initiating cells for positive selection, whereas the negative cells used for counter selection were non-tumour initiating cells and human neural progenitor cells (NCPs). Microarray analysis for the positive aptamerbound tumour initiating cells showed gene expression profiles and molecular pathways that promote tumorgenesis [95]. Glioblastoma is classified as one of the most lethal cancers. Therefore, the selection of aptamers that can specifically bind the CSCs of Glioblastoma using cell-SELEX could help discover and characterize new biomarkers for these cells which might eventually be used for effective targeted drug delivery against such tumor cells.
Aptamers against prostate cancer stem cells: Prostate cancer is considered one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Sefah et al. applied cell-SELEX to select DNA aptamers that successfully targeted prostate CSCs. This study used the DU145 prostate cancer cell line for positive selection, which ended up with two main panels of aptamers. The first panel (3 aptamers) bound to 90% of cells while the second panel (5 aptamers) bound to 15% of cells. Further characterization for the 15% of cells that did bind to the second panel showed characteristics of prostate CSCs including high expression levels of E-cadherin and CD44, high aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 activity, spheroid growth in non adherent conditions, and the ability of this portion of cancer cells to initiate tumours in immune-compromised mice. These results demonstrate the potential of using the first panel for diagnostic purposes and the second panel for targeting prostate CSCs [96]. In further work performed by Wang et al. two of the selected aptamers were conjugated to gold nanorods (AuNRs) for targeted thermotherapy of prostate cancers. One of those aptamers did bind to all DU145 while the second one did bind to the CSC portion of DU145 cells. The results of this study open the doors towards high specificity targeting and efficient inhibition and control of prostate CSCs [97].
Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR): The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is a member of a receptor tyrosine kinase family of four kinases including EGFR, ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4. Normally, this family play a role in regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Gene over expression or activating mutations in EGFR have been linked to many cancers where they played key roles in tumoregenesis, cell proliferation, matastasis, and drug resistance [98]. Recently, over-expression or activating mutations of EGFR were found to play a role in the maintenance and survival of CSCs by inducing the expression of CSC markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas [99]. Interestingly, recent evidence showed the co-localization of CD44 with EGFR on head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Inhibition of CD44 using siRNA resulted in down regulation by phosphorylation of EGFR thereby indicating a crosstalk between CD44 and EGFR signalling pathways [100]. Aptamers have been selected against EGFR and showed a promising potency in inhibiting this receptor. An interesting study performed by Esposito et al. described the selection of nuclease resistant RNA aptamer (named CL4) that is able to bind specifically EGFR cancer expressing cells with an affinity of 10 nM. This study showed that CL4 is able to induce apoptosis in EGFR positive cells while having no effect on EGFR negative cells. Moreover, CL4 aptamer inhibition efficacy was compared with two anticancer agents, gefitinib and cetuximab, using the A549 lung cancer cell line and showed sensitivity to the CL4 aptamer at 200 nM concentrations while being resistant to gefitinib and cetuximab at 0.1-10 and 0.05-1 μM concentrations, respectively. In addition, the CL4 aptamer and cetuximab showed synergy when administered into a xenograft model of non-small lung carcinoma compared to each drug alone [101]. This study demonstrates the possibility to evolve aptamers that can overcome cancer cell resistance, especially CSCs, to conventional therapeutics.
Future perspectives
The CSC hypothesis has been formulated based on experiments demonstrating the ability of a subpopulation of cancer cells to initiate and maintain tumors. These cells were shown to resist conventional anti-cancer therapies and induce relapse. The development of strategies to isolate and characterize CSCs is essential to better understand their behavior, and this is largely dependent on the identification of more specific marker proteins expressed on these cells. Although some markers have been shown to be highly expressed on CSCs, none of them has the required optimal exclusiveness of expression, which remains as one of the major challenges facing researchers. The cell-SELEX method comprises a powerful method that can accelerate the discovery of such new specific CSCs biomarkers, which should facilitate the development of effective specific targeting ligands and platforms for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
Although monoclonal antibodies are currently the clear first choice candidate to be incorporated into the new generation of the "smart" targeted anticancer drugs, aptamers are expected to be their serious future contender and the coming few years may witness some fierce competition between the two classes of molecules. Indeed, year after year, more clinical trials involving aptamers are underway, and this growing trend is supported by the increasing number of new biotech companies investing in this new technology.
The field of aptamers is maturing and is coming of age and one good indicator in this regard is the exponential increase in the annual number of related publications witnessed over the last decade. The technology is evolving rapidly and is becoming more accessible by the introduction of new developments including for example the automation of the SELEX method making the selection process faster and more reproducible, plus the various modifications on the different components of the nucleic acid basic structure to enhance the properties of aptamers as therapeutic molecules. With such rapid evolution of the aptamer technology and the expansion of its use in applications related to CSCs, we could witness some promising breakthroughs in this field in the near future.
We wish to thank the Hamdi Mango Center for Scientific Research (HMCSR) and the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at the University of Jordan, for their continued support of our research on aptamers.



 Download    pdf version of this article


Tables at a glance

Table 1

Figures at a glance

Figure 1  Figure 2
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
Relevant Topics
Disc Acupuncture Therapy
Disc Adrenal Disorders
Disc Advance Methods in Molecular Biology
Disc Advances in In-vitro Fertilization
Disc Advances in Naturopathic Treatment
Disc Adverse Effects
Disc African Traditional Medicine
Disc Antibodies Drug Conjugates
Disc Antigen – Antibody Reaction
Disc Anxiety Medicine
Disc Appetite
Disc Artificial Insemination
Disc Assisted Reproduction
Disc Australian Traditional Medicine
Disc Behavioral Endocrinology
Disc Bioactive Compound
Disc Biochemistry Techniques
Disc Biological Assay
Disc Biological Lab Techniques
Disc Biology of Cancer
Disc Biomarkers in Clinical Trials
Disc Biomarkers in Oncology
Disc Bipolar Medicine
Disc Calcium Homeostasis
Disc Causality Assesment
Disc Cellular Biology Techniques
Disc Cellular Endocrinology
Disc Cellular Medicine
Disc Chinese Acupuncture
Disc Chinese Medicine
Disc Clinical Biotherapeutics
Disc Clinical Naturopathic Medicine
Disc Clinical Naturopathy
Disc Clinical Pharmacovigilance
Disc Clinical Trials Pharmacovigilance
Disc Cloning
Disc Comparative Endocrinology
Disc Depression Medicine
Disc Diabetes
Disc Diabetic Medicine
Disc Diagnosis of Tuberculosis
Disc Diagnostic Therapeutics
Disc Disease Diagnosis
Disc Drosophila Melanogaster
Disc Drug Delivery using Nanotechnology
Disc Drug Designing
Disc Drug Monitoring
Disc Drug Safety Survillance
Disc Endocrine Oncology
Disc Endocrine System Diseases
Disc Endocrinologist
Disc Endocrinologist Communication
Disc Endocrinology Case Reports
Disc Endometriosis Treatment
Disc Epigenetic modification
Disc Epigenomics
Disc Europe Pharmacovigilance
Disc Evolutionary Biology
Disc Experts Opinion on Nanomedicine
Disc Fertility Acupuncture
Disc Fragment Based Drug Design
Disc Gene Engineering
Disc Gene Technology
Disc Gene Therapy
Disc Gene chip technology
Disc Gene expression
Disc Gene mutations
Disc Gene profiling
Disc Gene variation
Disc Genetic Diagnosis
Disc Genetic Engineering in Medicine
Disc Genetic Screening
Disc Genetically Modified Organisms
Disc Genetics Techniques
Disc Genomic Medicine
Disc Good Pharmacovigilance Practice
Disc Graves’ Disease
Disc Heat Shock Proteins
Disc Herbal Medicines
Disc Holistic Cancer Treatment
Disc Holistic Nutrition
Disc Holistic health
Disc Homeopathic Medicine
Disc Homeopathic Remedies
Disc Hormonal Imbalance
Disc Human Biology
Disc Human Molecular Genetics
Disc IVF Treatment
Disc Implementation and Implications of Nanomedicine
Disc In Silico Methods
Disc In vitro Diagnostics
Disc Infertility
Disc Infertility Treatment
Disc Japan Pharmacovigilance
Disc Japanese Traditional Medicine
Disc Korean Traditional Medicine
Disc Lipid based Nanoparticles
Disc Marker Assisted Breeding
Disc Medical Literature
Disc Medication Error
Disc Medicinal Biotechnology
Disc Menopause
Disc Metabolomics
Disc Methods in Molecular Biology
Disc Molecular Basis of Cancer
Disc Molecular Basis of Obesity
Disc Molecular Biology Techniques
Disc Molecular Biomarkers
Disc Molecular Diagnosis
Disc Molecular Diagnostic Market
Disc Molecular Genetic Test
Disc Molecular Medicine
Disc Molecular Modeling
Disc Molecular Tools for Earlier Diagnosis
Disc Nanobiopharmaceuticals
Disc Nanoemulsions
Disc Nanomedical Tools in Gene Therapy
Disc Nanomedicals
Disc Nanomedicine
Disc Nanomedicine Applications
Disc Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
Disc Nanomedicine in Cancer
Disc Nanomedicine in Drug Discovery
Disc Nanoparticles and Biocompatibility
Disc Nanotechnology
Disc Natural Remedies
Disc Naturopathic Medicine
Disc Naturopathic Practioner Communications
Disc Naturopathy
Disc Naturopathy Clinic Management
Disc Neuro-Endocrinology
Disc Next-Generation Sequencing
Disc Nuclear Medicine
Disc Oxidative Stress Biomarkers
Disc Paediatric Endocrinology
Disc Parathyroid
Disc Pathology Diagnosis
Disc Pathology and Molecular Medicine
Disc Peptidomimetic
Disc Periodic Safety Update Reports
Disc Personalized Medicine
Disc Pharma Risk Management
Disc Pharmacovigilance Regulatory Updates
Disc Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management
Disc Pharmacovigilance for Alternative Medicine
Disc Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
Disc Polymeric Nanoparticle Delivery
Disc Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)
Disc Premature Ovarian Failure (POF)
Disc Prenatal Care
Disc Prenatal Healthcare
Disc Protease Substrate/Inhibitor
Disc Radiolabelling Techniques in Biology
Disc Receptor Agonist/ Antagonist
Disc Recombinant Gene
Disc Reproductive Genetics
Disc Reproductive Health
Disc Reproductive Medicine
Disc Resistant genes
Disc Salivary Biomarkers
Disc Sampling Techniques in Biology
Disc Semen Analysis and Sperm Characteristics
Disc Serum Biomarkers
Disc Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
Disc Structural Biology Techniques
Disc Structure Based Drug Design
Disc Therapeutic Agents
Disc Toxicity of Nanomaterials
Disc Traditional Asian Medicine
Disc Traditional Plant Medicine
Disc Traditional medicine
Disc Transporter gene
Disc Tumour Biomarkers
Disc UK Pharmacovigilance
Disc UK naturopathy
Disc US Pharmacovigilance
Disc Veterinary Pharmacovigilance
Disc Virus Diagnosis
Disc screening and Drug Design
Related Journals
Disc Advanced Techniques in Biology & Medicine
Disc Biology and Medicine
Disc Drug Designing Journals
Disc Gene Technology Journals
Disc Journal of Fertilization: In Vitro - IVF-Worldwide, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Stem Cell Biology
Disc Journal of Nanomedicine & Biotherapeutic Discovery
Disc Journal of Traditional Medicine & Clinical Naturopathy
Disc Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis Journals
Disc Molecular Endocrinology Journals
Disc Pharmacovigilance Journals
Related Conferences
Disc 8th World Congress on Molecular Pathology
June 26-27, 2017 San Diego, USA
Disc 2nd World Congress on Molecular Genetics and Gene Therapy
July 3-5, 2017 Bangkok, Thailand
Disc 9th International Conference and Expo on Molecular & Cancer Biomarkers
August 23-24, 2017 Birmingham, UK
Article Tools
Disc Export citation
Disc Share/Blog this article

Post your comment

Your question:
Anti Spam Code:
  Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

OMICS International Conferences 2016-17

Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings
Conferences By Country
  USA   Spain   Poland
  Australia   Canada   Austria
  UAE   Switzerland   Turkey
  Italy   France   Finland
  Germany   India   Ukraine
  UK   Malaysia   Denmark
  Japan   Singapore   Mexico
  Brazil   South Africa   Norway
  South Korea   New Zealand   China
  Netherlands   Philippines
Medical & Clinical Conferences
Microbiology Oncology & Cancer
Diabetes & Endocrinology Cardiology
Nursing Dentistry
Healthcare Management Physical Therapy Rehabilitation
Neuroscience Psychiatry
Immunology Infectious Diseases
Gastroenterology Medical Ethics & Health Policies
Genetics & Molecular Biology Palliativecare
Pathology Reproductive Medicine & Women Healthcare
Alternative Healthcare Surgery
Pediatrics Radiology
Conferences by Subject
Pharmaceutical Sciences
Pharma Marketing & Industry
Environmental Science
Physics & Materials Science
EEE & Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Business Management
Geology & Earth science
©2008-2016 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version